↓ Skip to main content

Rubber band ligation versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
94 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rubber band ligation versus excisional haemorrhoidectomy for haemorrhoids
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005034.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Venkatesh Shanmugam, Abdul Hakeem, Ken L Campbell, Kannaiyan S Rabindranath, Robert JC Steele, Mohamed A Thaha, Malcolm A. Loudon

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2020.
All research outputs
#5,144,946
of 16,206,553 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,873
of 11,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,663
of 291,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#180
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,206,553 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.9. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.