You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early feeding of larger volumes of formula milk is associated with greater body weight or overweight in later infancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12937-018-0322-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Junmei Huang, Zhen Zhang, Yuanjue Wu, Yan Wang, Jing Wang, Li Zhou, Zemin Ni, Liping Hao, Nianhong Yang, Xuefeng Yang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 11% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Ireland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 145 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 66 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 70 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,235,694
of 25,402,528 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#803
of 1,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,541
of 450,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#16
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,528 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.