You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fluvoxamine versus other anti‐depressive agents for depression
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006114.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ichiro M Omori, Norio Watanabe, Atsuo Nakagawa, Andrea Cipriani, Corrado Barbui, Hugh McGuire, Rachel Churchill, Toshi A Furukawa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 329 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 323 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 12% |
| Researcher | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 17% |
| Unknown | 89 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 31% |
| Psychology | 37 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 12% |
| Unknown | 101 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,135,326
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,767
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,765
of 110,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#19
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.