↓ Skip to main content

Fungal Endocarditis

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 169)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fungal Endocarditis
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, May 2016
DOI 10.5935/1678-9741.20160026
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shi-Min Yuan

Abstract

Fungal endocarditis is a rare and fatal condition. The Candida and Aspergillus species are the two most common etiologic fungi found responsible for fungal endocarditis. Fever and changing heart murmur are the most common clinical manifestations. Some patients may have a fever of unknown origin as the onset symptom. The diagnosis of fungal endocarditis is challenging, and diagnosis of prosthetic valve fungal endocarditis is extremely difficult. The optimum antifungal therapy still remains debatable. Treating Candida endocarditis can be difficult because the Candida species can form biofilms on native and prosthetic heart valves. Combined treatment appears superior to monotherapy. Combination of antifungal therapy and surgical debridement might bring about better prognosis.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 110 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Other 12 11%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 33 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 42 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2018.
All research outputs
#6,377,546
of 21,094,310 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#15
of 169 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,155
of 398,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,094,310 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 169 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,184 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them