↓ Skip to main content

Landscape community genomics: understanding eco-evolutionary processes in complex environments

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
446 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Landscape community genomics: understanding eco-evolutionary processes in complex environments
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, March 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian K. Hand, Winsor H. Lowe, Ryan P. Kovach, Clint C. Muhlfeld, Gordon Luikart

Abstract

Extrinsic factors influencing evolutionary processes are often categorically lumped into interactions that are environmentally (e.g., climate, landscape) or community-driven, with little consideration of the overlap or influence of one on the other. However, genomic variation is strongly influenced by complex and dynamic interactions between environmental and community effects. Failure to consider both effects on evolutionary dynamics simultaneously can lead to incomplete, spurious, or erroneous conclusions about the mechanisms driving genomic variation. We highlight the need for a landscape community genomics (LCG) framework to help to motivate and challenge scientists in diverse fields to consider a more holistic, interdisciplinary perspective on the genomic evolution of multi-species communities in complex environments.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 446 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 21 5%
Germany 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 393 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 130 29%
Researcher 97 22%
Student > Master 61 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 6%
Other 77 17%
Unknown 23 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 293 66%
Environmental Science 64 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 <1%
Social Sciences 2 <1%
Other 8 2%
Unknown 41 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2017.
All research outputs
#1,092,920
of 14,777,570 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#742
of 2,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,044
of 281,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#15
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,777,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.