↓ Skip to main content

Coffee and tea consumption and risk of pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 2,069)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
19 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
35 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coffee and tea consumption and risk of pre- and postmenopausal breast cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort study
Published in
Breast Cancer Research, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13058-015-0521-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nirmala Bhoo-Pathy, Petra HM Peeters, Cuno SPM Uiterwaal, H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita, Awang M Bulgiba, Bodil Hammer Bech, Kim Overvad, Anne Tjønneland, Anja Olsen, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Guy Fagherazzi, Florence Perquier, Birgit Teucher, Rudolf Kaaks, Madlen Schütze, Heiner Boeing, Pagona Lagiou, Philippos Orfanos, Antonia Trichopoulou, Claudia Agnoli, Amalia Mattiello, Domenico Palli, Rosario Tumino, Carlotta Sacerdote, Franzel JB van Duijnhoven, Tonje Braaten, Eiliv Lund, Guri Skeie, María-Luisa Redondo, Genevieve Buckland, Maria José Sánchez Pérez, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Eva Ardanaz, Pilar Amiano, Elisabet Wirfält, Peter Wallström, Ingegerd Johansson, Lena Maria Nilsson, Kay-Tee Khaw, Nick Wareham, Naomi E Allen, Timothy J Key, Sabina Rinaldi, Isabelle Romieu, Valentina Gallo, Elio Riboli, Carla H van Gils

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 126 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 16%
Researcher 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 35 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 39 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 179. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#229,563
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research
#20
of 2,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,615
of 363,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research
#1
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.