↓ Skip to main content

Blood pressure control for diabetic retinopathy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Blood pressure control for diabetic retinopathy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006127.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Diana V Do, Xue Wang, Satyanarayana S Vedula, Michael Marrone, Gina Sleilati, Barbara S Hawkins, Robert N Frank

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy is a common complication of diabetes and a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness. Research has established the importance of blood glucose control to prevent development and progression of the ocular complications of diabetes. Simultaneous blood pressure control has been advocated for the same purpose, but findings reported from individual studies have supported varying conclusions regarding the ocular benefit of interventions on blood pressure.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russia 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 61 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 78%
Student > Postgraduate 40 59%
Student > Bachelor 36 53%
Researcher 35 51%
Unspecified 32 47%
Other 92 135%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 147 216%
Unspecified 44 65%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 18%
Other 46 68%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#746,875
of 12,942,450 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,464
of 10,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,493
of 275,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#61
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,942,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.