↓ Skip to main content

Filantropia e assistencialismo no Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Filantropia e assistencialismo no Brasil
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, December 2003
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702003000300017
Authors

Gisele Sanglard

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,106,884
of 13,104,802 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#310
of 1,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,220
of 275,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,104,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,249 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.