↓ Skip to main content

Surgical treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture with adjustable cortical button

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition), January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical treatment of pectoralis major muscle rupture with adjustable cortical button
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition), January 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.11.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alberto de Castro Pochini, Marcus de Souza Barbosa Rodrigues, Larissa Yamashita, Paulo Santoro Belangero, Carlos Vicente Andreoli, Benno Ejnisman

Abstract

To assess the tendon reconstruction technique for total rupture of the pectoralis major muscle using an adjustable cortical button. Prospective study of 27 male patients with a mean age of 29.9 (SD = 5.3 years) and follow-up of 2.3 years. The procedure consisted of autologous grafts taken from the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons and an adjustable cortical button. Patients were evaluated functionally by the Bak criteria. The surgical treatment of pectoralis major muscle tendon reconstruction was performed in the early stages (three weeks) in six patients (22.2%) and in 21 patients (77.8%), in the late stages. Patients operated with the adjustable cortical button technique obtained 96.3% excellent or good results, with only 3.7% having poor results (Bak criteria). Of the total, 85.2% were injured while performing bench press exercises and 14.8%, during the practice of Brazilian jiu-jitsu or wrestling. All weight-lifting athletes had history of anabolic steroid use. The early or delayed reconstruction of ruptured pectoralis major muscle tendons with considerable muscle retraction, using an adjustable cortical button and autologous knee flexor grafts, showed a high rate of good results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 19%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 27%
Sports and Recreations 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 21 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2018.
All research outputs
#23,320,957
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)
#109
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#394,250
of 454,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (English Edition)
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.