The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Sea-level rise and other influences on decadal-scale salinity variability in a coastal plain estuary
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Estuarine Coastal & Shelf Science, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ecss.2015.01.022 |
| Authors |
Andrew C. Ross, Raymond G. Najjar, Ming Li, Michael E. Mann, Susan E. Ford, Brandon Katz |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 23 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 14% |
| Engineering | 11 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,840,337
of 26,123,112 outputs
Outputs from Estuarine Coastal & Shelf Science
#955
of 3,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,778
of 280,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Estuarine Coastal & Shelf Science
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,123,112 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.