↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for treating sexual dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for treating sexual dysfunction in patients with chronic kidney disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, December 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007747.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariacristina Vecchio, Sankar D Navaneethan, David W Johnson, Giuseppe Lucisano, Giusi Graziano, Valeria Saglimbene, Marinella Ruospo, Marialuisa Querques, Emmanuele A Jannini, Giovanni FM Strippoli

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 132 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 8%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 33 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Psychology 9 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 38 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,869,228
of 14,723,618 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,617
of 11,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,716
of 281,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#162
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,723,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.