↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for cellulitis and erysipelas
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004299.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally A Kilburn, Peter Featherstone, Bernie Higgins, Richard Brindle

Abstract

Cellulitis and erysipelas are now usually considered manifestations of the same condition, a skin infection associated with severe pain and systemic symptoms. A range of antibiotic treatments are suggested in guidelines.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 227 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 40 17%
Student > Master 36 15%
Researcher 26 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 11%
Student > Postgraduate 20 9%
Other 54 23%
Unknown 33 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 124 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 4%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 42 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2019.
All research outputs
#776,741
of 15,922,732 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,141
of 11,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,291
of 289,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#52
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,732 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.