↓ Skip to main content

Screening for antimicrobial activity of ten medicinal plants used in Colombian folkloric medicine: A possible alternative in the treatment of non-nosocomial infections

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, February 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
438 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening for antimicrobial activity of ten medicinal plants used in Colombian folkloric medicine: A possible alternative in the treatment of non-nosocomial infections
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, February 2006
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-6-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jhon J Rojas, Veronica J Ochoa, Saul A Ocampo, John F Muñoz

Abstract

The antimicrobial activity and Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of the extracts of Bidens pilosa L., Bixa orellana L., Cecropia peltata L., Cinchona officinalis L., Gliricidia sepium H.B. & K, Jacaranda mimosifolia D.Don, Justicia secunda Vahl., Piper pulchrum C.DC, P. paniculata L. and Spilanthes americana Hieron were evaluated against five bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus beta hemolític, Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli), and one yeast (Candida albicans). These plants are used in Colombian folk medicine to treat infections of microbial origin.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 438 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Poland 3 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Honduras 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 425 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 73 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 14%
Student > Master 50 11%
Researcher 40 9%
Student > Postgraduate 26 6%
Other 88 20%
Unknown 99 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 130 30%
Chemistry 49 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 32 7%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 102 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2018.
All research outputs
#4,695,422
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#874
of 3,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,554
of 70,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,624 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.