↓ Skip to main content

Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
36 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2018
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009669.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Schumann, Eva C Henrich, Hellen Strobl, Roland Prondzinsky, Sophie Weiche, Holger Thiele, Karl Werdan, Stefan Frantz, Susanne Unverzagt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 266 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Student > Master 29 11%
Researcher 25 9%
Other 21 8%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Other 56 21%
Unknown 81 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 123 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 19 7%
Unknown 94 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2021.
All research outputs
#994,813
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,960
of 13,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,115
of 457,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#56
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.