↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to prevent hypothermia at birth in preterm and/or low birthweight infants

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions to prevent hypothermia at birth in preterm and/or low birthweight infants
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004210.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma M McCall, Fiona Alderdice, Henry L Halliday, John G Jenkins, Sunita Vohra

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 2 1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 140 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 20%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Other 15 10%
Other 28 19%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 91 62%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Psychology 7 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 18 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#3,810,726
of 14,780,221 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,489
of 11,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,895
of 281,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#161
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,780,221 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,052 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.