↓ Skip to main content

The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
765 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
413 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update
Published in
Genome Medicine, January 2009
DOI 10.1186/gm13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter D Stenson, Matthew Mort, Edward V Ball, Katy Howells, Andrew D Phillips, Nick ST Thomas, David N Cooper

Abstract

The Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD((R))) is a comprehensive core collection of germline mutations in nuclear genes that underlie or are associated with human inherited disease. Here, we summarize the history of the database and its current resources. By December 2008, the database contained over 85,000 different lesions detected in 3,253 different genes, with new entries currently accumulating at a rate exceeding 9,000 per annum. Although originally established for the scientific study of mutational mechanisms in human genes, HGMD has since acquired a much broader utility for researchers, physicians, clinicians and genetic counselors as well as for companies specializing in biopharmaceuticals, bioinformatics and personalized genomics. HGMD was first made publicly available in April 1996, and a collaboration was initiated in 2006 between HGMD and BIOBASE GmbH. This cooperative agreement covers the exclusive worldwide marketing of the most up-to-date (subscription) version of HGMD, HGMD Professional, to academic, clinical and commercial users.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 3%
United Kingdom 5 1%
Germany 4 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 379 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 26%
Researcher 83 20%
Student > Master 41 10%
Student > Bachelor 38 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 8%
Other 63 15%
Unknown 48 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 149 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 82 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 72 17%
Computer Science 21 5%
Chemistry 6 1%
Other 29 7%
Unknown 54 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2018.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#1,176
of 1,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,509
of 184,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.