↓ Skip to main content

Development of a Species Status Assessment Process for Decisions under the U.S. Endangered Species Act

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 175)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a Species Status Assessment Process for Decisions under the U.S. Endangered Species Act
Published in
Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management, February 2018
DOI 10.3996/052017-jfwm-041
Authors

David R. Smith, Nathan L. Allan, Conor P. McGowan, Jennifer A. Szymanski, Susan R. Oetker, Heather M. Bell

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 23%
Student > Master 14 13%
Other 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 15 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 44%
Environmental Science 23 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Decision Sciences 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 20 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2021.
All research outputs
#5,953,907
of 19,157,212 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#45
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,668
of 385,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,157,212 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them