You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of a Species Status Assessment Process for Decisions under the U.S. Endangered Species Act
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3996/052017-jfwm-041 |
| Authors |
David R. Smith, Nathan L. Allan, Conor P. McGowan, Jennifer A. Szymanski, Susan R. Oetker, Heather M. Bell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 44% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Decision Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,403,646
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#22
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,108
of 448,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.