↓ Skip to main content

Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006212.pub4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Young, Hangwi Tang, Rodney Hughes

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 9%
Turkey 1 2%
France 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Singapore 1 2%
Unknown 54 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 25%
Student > Master 10 16%
Other 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 19 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 77%
Unspecified 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2018.
All research outputs
#3,706,540
of 12,698,697 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,868
of 10,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,913
of 275,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#170
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,698,697 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.