↓ Skip to main content

Public health failure in the prevention of neural tube defects: time to abandon the tolerable upper intake level of folate

Overview of attention for article published in Public Health Reviews, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 278)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
105 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
51 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Public health failure in the prevention of neural tube defects: time to abandon the tolerable upper intake level of folate
Published in
Public Health Reviews, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40985-018-0079-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas J. Wald, Joan K. Morris, Colin Blakemore

Abstract

The neural tube defects anencephaly and spina bifida are two of the most common serious congenital malformations. Most cases can be prevented by consuming sufficient folic acid immediately before pregnancy and in early pregnancy. Fortification of flour with folic acid to prevent these defects has been implemented in 81 countries without public objection or indication of harm. An obstacle to the wider adoption of fortification arises from the creation of a "tolerable upper intake level" for folate (which includes natural food folate as well as synthetic folic acid), and which has been set at 1 mg/day, thereby proscribing higher folate intakes. Increasing the intake of folic acid in a population will necessarily increase the number of people with a folate intake greater than 1 mg per day, and this concern is obstructing folic acid fortification. This paper shows that the scientific basis for setting any upper limit, let alone one at 1 mg/day, is flawed. An upper intake level is therefore unnecessary and should be removed, thus allaying unjustified concerns about folic acid fortification. As a result, the full global opportunity to prevent two serious fatal or disabling disorders can and should be realized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 164 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Researcher 15 9%
Other 10 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 43 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 55 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 891. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#19,512
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Public Health Reviews
#1
of 278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#410
of 448,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Health Reviews
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them