↓ Skip to main content

Mu‐opioid antagonists for opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mu‐opioid antagonists for opioid‐induced bowel dysfunction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2008
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006332.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

McNicol ED, Boyce D, Schumann R, Carr DB, McNicol, Ewan D, Boyce, David, Schumann, Roman, Carr, Daniel B

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Russian Federation 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Hong Kong 1 1%
Unknown 75 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 28 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 60%
Unspecified 11 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 10 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2016.
All research outputs
#762,976
of 8,755,660 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,948
of 8,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,189
of 243,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,755,660 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.