You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Should action take priority over further research on public health?
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Medical Journal, February 2018
|
DOI | 10.1136/bmj.k292 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Simon Capewell, Paul Cairney, Aileen Clarke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 35 | 35% |
Canada | 8 | 8% |
United States | 7 | 7% |
Spain | 5 | 5% |
Australia | 3 | 3% |
Ireland | 2 | 2% |
Peru | 1 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 35 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 52 | 52% |
Scientists | 25 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 21% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 43% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 21% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 14% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2019.
All research outputs
#774,965
of 25,554,853 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#8,269
of 64,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,123
of 449,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#149
of 717 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,554,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 717 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.