↓ Skip to main content

High-energy, high-fat lifestyle challenges an Arctic apex predator, the polar bear

Overview of attention for article published in Science, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
178 news outlets
blogs
20 blogs
twitter
1100 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-energy, high-fat lifestyle challenges an Arctic apex predator, the polar bear
Published in
Science, February 2018
DOI 10.1126/science.aan8677
Pubmed ID
Authors

A M Pagano, G M Durner, K D Rode, T C Atwood, S N Atkinson, E Peacock, D P Costa, M A Owen, T M Williams

Abstract

Regional declines in polar bear (Ursus maritimus) populations have been attributed to changing sea ice conditions, but with limited information on the causative mechanisms. By simultaneously measuring field metabolic rates, daily activity patterns, body condition, and foraging success of polar bears moving on the spring sea ice, we found that high metabolic rates (1.6 times greater than previously assumed) coupled with low intake of fat-rich marine mammal prey resulted in an energy deficit for more than half of the bears examined. Activity and movement on the sea ice strongly influenced metabolic demands. Consequently, increases in mobility resulting from ongoing and forecasted declines in and fragmentation of sea ice are likely to increase energy demands and may be an important factor explaining observed declines in body condition and survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 300 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 16%
Student > Master 44 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 14%
Researcher 35 12%
Other 14 5%
Other 34 11%
Unknown 84 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 34%
Environmental Science 44 15%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Engineering 5 2%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 93 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2234. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,830
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Science
#199
of 83,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48
of 451,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#8
of 1,178 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,178 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.