↓ Skip to main content

Lessons from genome-wide studies: an integrated definition of the coactivator function of histone acetyl transferases

Overview of attention for article published in Epigenetics & Chromatin, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lessons from genome-wide studies: an integrated definition of the coactivator function of histone acetyl transferases
Published in
Epigenetics & Chromatin, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1756-8935-3-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krishanpal Anamika, Arnaud R Krebs, Julie Thompson, Olivier Poch, Didier Devys, Làszlò Tora

Abstract

Histone acetylation is one of the key regulatory mechanisms controlling transcriptional activity in eukaryotic cells. In higher eukaryotes, a number of nuclear histone acetyltransferase (HAT) enzymes have been identified, most of which are part of a large multisubunit complex. This diversity, combined with the large number of potentially acetylable lysines on histones, suggested the existence of a specific regulatory mechanism based on the substrate specificity of HATs. Over the past decade, intensive characterisations of the HAT complexes have been carried out. However, the precise mode of action of HATs, and particularly the functional differences amongst these complexes, remains elusive. Here we review current insights into the functional role of HATs, focusing on the specificity of their action. Studies based on biochemical as well as genetic approaches suggested that HATs exert a high degree of specificity in their acetylation spectra and in the cellular processes they regulate. However, a different view emerged recently from genomic approaches that provided genome-wide maps of HAT recruitments. The careful analysis of genomic data suggests that all HAT complexes would be simultaneously recruited to a similar set of loci in the genome, arguing for a low specificity in their function. In this review, we discuss the significance of these apparent contradictions and suggest a new model that integrates biochemical, genetic and genome-wide data to better describe the functional specificity of HAT complexes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Ireland 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 28%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Professor 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 28%
Computer Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,708,493
of 23,443,716 outputs
Outputs from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#318
of 573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,057
of 100,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epigenetics & Chromatin
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,443,716 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them