↓ Skip to main content

Combining InSAR and GPS to Determine Transient Movement and Thickness of a Seasonally Active Low‐Gradient Translational Landslide

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Combining InSAR and GPS to Determine Transient Movement and Thickness of a Seasonally Active Low‐Gradient Translational Landslide
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, February 2018
DOI 10.1002/2017gl076623
Authors

Xie Hu, Zhong Lu, Thomas C. Pierson, Rebecca Kramer, David L. George

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Other 12 26%
Unknown 10 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 16 35%
Engineering 7 15%
Unspecified 5 11%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2018.
All research outputs
#10,053,197
of 17,913,039 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#10,791
of 17,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,178
of 377,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#179
of 373 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,913,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 373 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.