↓ Skip to main content

Emergency interventions for hyperkalaemia

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
122 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Emergency interventions for hyperkalaemia
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003235.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian A Mahoney, Willard AD Smith, Dorothy Lo, Keith Tsoi, Marcello Tonelli, Catherine Clase

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 161 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 28 16%
Student > Postgraduate 24 14%
Researcher 23 14%
Other 19 11%
Student > Master 17 10%
Other 48 28%
Unknown 11 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 120 71%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 16 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,985,507
of 13,644,952 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,670
of 10,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,112
of 279,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#118
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,644,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.