You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods for preventing pregnancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd001326.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jo Power, Rebecca French, Frances M. Cowan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 223 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 58 | 26% |
| Unknown | 56 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 87 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 14 | 6% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 58 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,667,324
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,261
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,894
of 77,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#13
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.