The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pathogenic variability of Moniliophthora perniciosa in three agroecological zones of the cacao region of Bahia, Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Crop Breeding & Applied Biotechnology, January 2016
|
DOI | 10.1590/1984-70332016v16n1a2 |
Authors |
Karina Peres Gramacho, Edna Dora Martins Newman Luz, Fernanda Santos da Silva, Uilson Vanderlei Lopes, Jose Luis Pires, Lindolfo Pereira |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 5 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Other | 8 | 18% |
Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 43% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 18% |
Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,949,326
of 26,391,552 outputs
Outputs from Crop Breeding & Applied Biotechnology
#20
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,774
of 403,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Crop Breeding & Applied Biotechnology
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,391,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.