You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Characterizing rainfall erosivity by kinetic power - Median volume diameter relationship
CATENA, June 2018
Francesco G. Carollo, Maria A. Serio, Vito Ferro, Artemi Cerdà
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||67%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||33%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Professor > Associate Professor||3||13%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||13%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||9%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||3||13%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||2||9%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||4%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2018.
All research outputs
of 23,020,670 outputs
Outputs from CATENA
of 1,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 330,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CATENA
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,020,670 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,246 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.