You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Zinc supplementation for improving pregnancy and infant outcome
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000230.pub5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Erika Ota, Rintaro Mori, Philippa Middleton, Ruoyan Tobe-Gai, Kassam Mahomed, Celine Miyazaki, Zulfiqar A Bhutta |
Abstract |
It has been suggested that low serum zinc levels may be associated with suboptimal outcomes of pregnancy such as prolonged labour, atonic postpartum haemorrhage, pregnancy-induced hypertension, preterm labour and post-term pregnancies, although many of these associations have not yet been established. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 17% |
Germany | 1 | 17% |
Chile | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 475 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 465 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 64 | 13% |
Student > Master | 63 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 58 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 10% |
Other | 31 | 7% |
Other | 89 | 19% |
Unknown | 123 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 153 | 32% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 63 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 23 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 4% |
Other | 56 | 12% |
Unknown | 131 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#829,315
of 24,898,480 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,638
of 13,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,348
of 363,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#35
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,898,480 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.