↓ Skip to main content

Geology of five small Australian impact craters

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geology of five small Australian impact craters
Published in
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, September 2005
DOI 10.1080/08120090500180921
Authors

E. M. Shoemaker, F. A. Macdonald, C. S. Shoemaker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 8%
China 1 3%
Unknown 32 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 14%
Professor 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Other 11 31%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 81%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Unknown 3 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,452,489
of 22,783,848 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Earth Sciences
#67
of 314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,389
of 58,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Earth Sciences
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,783,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.