↓ Skip to main content

Geology of five small Australian impact craters

Overview of attention for article published in Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Geology of five small Australian impact craters
Published in
Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, September 2005
DOI 10.1080/08120090500180921
Authors

E. M. Shoemaker, F. A. Macdonald, C. S. Shoemaker

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 12%
China 1 4%
Unknown 22 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 19%
Other 5 19%
Researcher 4 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Other 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 88%
Physics and Astronomy 2 8%
Chemistry 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2008.
All research outputs
#816,272
of 3,629,910 outputs
Outputs from Australian Journal of Earth Sciences
#12
of 95 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,471
of 94,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian Journal of Earth Sciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,629,910 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 63rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 95 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them