↓ Skip to main content

Ability of pleth variability index to detect hemodynamic changes induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing volunteers

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ability of pleth variability index to detect hemodynamic changes induced by passive leg raising in spontaneously breathing volunteers
Published in
Critical Care, March 2008
DOI 10.1186/cc6822
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoffray Keller, Emmanuel Cassar, Olivier Desebbe, Jean-Jacques Lehot, Maxime Cannesson

Abstract

Pleth Variability Index (PVI) is a new algorithm that allows continuous and automatic estimation of respiratory variations in the pulse oximeter waveform amplitude. Our aim was to test its ability to detect changes in preload induced by passive leg raising (PLR) in spontaneously breathing volunteers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 127 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 25 18%
Researcher 22 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 33 24%
Unknown 15 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 66%
Engineering 11 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 19 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2023.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,041
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,259
of 95,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#10
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.