↓ Skip to main content

Comparing predictions of extinction risk using models and subjective judgement

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Oecologica, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing predictions of extinction risk using models and subjective judgement
Published in
Acta Oecologica, October 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.actao.2004.01.008
Authors

Michael A. McCarthy, David Keith, Justine Tietjen, Mark A. Burgman, Mark Maunder, Larry Master, Barry W. Brook, Georgina Mace, Hugh P. Possingham, Rodrigo Medellin, Sandy Andelman, Helen Regan, Tracey Regan, Mary Ruckelshaus

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 12 6%
United States 7 3%
Australia 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 168 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 80 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 18%
Professor 18 9%
Other 16 8%
Student > Master 13 6%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 4 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 58%
Environmental Science 65 31%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 <1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 10 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,732,318
of 16,018,042 outputs
Outputs from Acta Oecologica
#103
of 414 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,087
of 290,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Oecologica
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,018,042 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 414 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.