You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bevacizumab plus octreotide and metronomic capecitabine in patients with metastatic well-to-moderately differentiated neuroendocrine tumors: the xelbevoct study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-14-184 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alfredo Berruti, Nicola Fazio, Anna Ferrero, Maria Pia Brizzi, Marco Volante, Elisabetta Nobili, Lucia Tozzi, Lisa Bodei, Mirella Torta, Antonio D’Avolio, Adriano Massimiliano Priola, Nadia Birocco, Vito Amoroso, Guido Biasco, Mauro Papotti, Luigi Dogliotti |
Abstract |
We assessed the activity and toxicity of the XELBEVOCT regimen in patients with metastatic well-to-moderately differentiated neuroendocrine neoplasms (WMD-NEN). Ancillary studies evaluated hypertension, proteinuria, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) polymorphisms in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and the predictive role of serum vitamin D in progression-free survival and proteinuria onset. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 16% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 11% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 21% |
Unknown | 18 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 47% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 22 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,319,634
of 22,785,242 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#4,103
of 8,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,031
of 221,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#74
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,785,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.