↓ Skip to main content

Inositol for depressive disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inositol for depressive disorders
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004049.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew J Taylor, Heather Wilder, Zubin Bhagwagar, John Geddes

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2010.
All research outputs
#3,639,768
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,905
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,329
of 272,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,397 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.