↓ Skip to main content

Institutional isomorphism, negativity bias and performance information use by politicians: A survey experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Public Administration, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
41 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Institutional isomorphism, negativity bias and performance information use by politicians: A survey experiment
Published in
Public Administration, February 2018
DOI 10.1111/padm.12390
Authors

Bert George, Martin Baekgaard, Adelien Decramer, Mieke Audenaert, Stijn Goeminne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 184 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 17%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 10%
Lecturer 16 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 36 20%
Unknown 47 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 63 34%
Business, Management and Accounting 35 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 15 8%
Computer Science 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 6 3%
Unknown 59 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,545,901
of 25,401,784 outputs
Outputs from Public Administration
#69
of 1,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,008
of 446,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Administration
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,401,784 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,226 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.