↓ Skip to main content

Institutional isomorphism, negativity bias and performance information use by politicians: A survey experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Public Administration, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#23 of 747)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Institutional isomorphism, negativity bias and performance information use by politicians: A survey experiment
Published in
Public Administration, March 2020
DOI 10.1111/padm.12390
Authors

Bert George, Martin Baekgaard, Adelien Decramer, Mieke Audenaert, Stijn Goeminne

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 30%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 14%
Lecturer 6 11%
Student > Master 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 5 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 25 44%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 26%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 6 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2020.
All research outputs
#782,053
of 14,734,241 outputs
Outputs from Public Administration
#23
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,510
of 359,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Administration
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,734,241 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.