↓ Skip to main content

Melanoma

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 2: Melanoma Epidemiology and Prevention
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Melanoma Epidemiology and Prevention
Chapter number 2
Book title
Melanoma
Published in
Cancer treatment and research, January 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-22539-5_2
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-922538-8, 978-3-31-922539-5
Authors

Marianne Berwick, David B. Buller, Anne Cust, Richard Gallagher, Tim K. Lee, Frank Meyskens, Shaily Pandey, Nancy E. Thomas, Marit B. Veierød, Sarah Ward

Abstract

The epidemiology of melanoma is complex, and individual risk depends on sun exposure, host factors, and genetic factors, and in their interactions as well. Sun exposure can be classified as intermittent, chronic, or cumulative (overall) exposure, and each appears to have a different effect on type of melanoma. Other environmental factors, such as chemical exposures-either through occupation, atmosphere, or food-may increase risk for melanoma, and this area warrants further study. Host factors that are well known to be important are the numbers and types of nevi and the skin phenotype. Genetic factors are classified as high-penetrant genes, moderate-risk genes, or low-risk genetic polymorphisms. Subtypes of tumors, such as BRAF-mutated tumors, have different risk factors as well as different therapies. Prevention of melanoma has been attempted using various strategies in specific subpopulations, but to date optimal interventions to reduce incidence have not emerged.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 131 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Master 12 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 38 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 38 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2020.
All research outputs
#15,484,498
of 23,009,818 outputs
Outputs from Cancer treatment and research
#95
of 167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,172
of 394,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer treatment and research
#14
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,009,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.