You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome: a review of the new guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Allergy Organization Journal, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40413-017-0182-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie A. Leonard, Valentina Pecora, Alessandro Giovanni Fiocchi, Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn |
| Abstract |
Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non IgE-mediated gastrointestinal food allergy that presents with delayed vomiting after ingestion primarily in infants. While the pathophysiology of FPIES is poorly understood, the clinical presentation of acute FPEIS reactions has been well characterized. The firstInternational Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Food Protein-induced Enterocolitis Syndromewere published in 2017 and reviewed epidemiology, clinical presentation, and prognosis of acute and chronic FPIES. The workgroup outlined clinical phenotypes, proposed diagnostic criteria, and made recommendations on management. This article summarizes the guidelines and adds recent updates. FPIES is gaining recognition, however there continues to be delays in diagnosis and misdiagnosis due to overlap of symptoms with over conditions, lack of a diagnostic test, and because some of the common trigger foods are not thought of as allergenic. More research into disease mechanisms and factors influencing differences between populations is needed. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 13% |
| Spain | 6 | 11% |
| Mexico | 6 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 16% |
| Scientists | 5 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 15% |
| Other | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 51 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 52 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,034,488
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from World Allergy Organization Journal
#36
of 891 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,489
of 446,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Allergy Organization Journal
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 891 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.