↓ Skip to main content

Broken Bones and Hammerstones at the Cerutti Mastodon Site: A Reply to Haynes

Overview of attention for article published in PaleoAmerica, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

1 Wikipedia page


8 Dimensions

Readers on

8 Mendeley
Broken Bones and Hammerstones at the Cerutti Mastodon Site: A Reply to Haynes
Published in
PaleoAmerica, November 2017
DOI 10.1080/20555563.2017.1396835

Steven R. Holen, Thomas A. Deméré, Daniel C. Fisher, Richard Fullagar, James B. Paces, George T. Jefferson, Jared M. Beeton, Adam N. Rountrey, Kathleen A. Holen

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 25%
Professor 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 3 38%
Social Sciences 2 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2018.
All research outputs
of 12,481,741 outputs
Outputs from PaleoAmerica
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 340,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PaleoAmerica
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,481,741 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one scored the same or higher as 25 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,436 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.