↓ Skip to main content

Neuroreflexotherapy for non-specific low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroreflexotherapy for non-specific low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003009.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerard Urrútia, A Kim Burton, Antoni Morral Fernández, Xavier Bonfill Cosp, Gustavo Zanoli

Abstract

Among the wide range of therapeutic alternatives proposed for the management of low-back pain (LBP), a less widely used technique from Spain, called neuroreflexotherapy (NRT) has claimed to show very favourable results, mainly in patients with chronic low-back pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Unspecified 7 11%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 54%
Unspecified 10 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Other 7 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2017.
All research outputs
#927,993
of 12,101,174 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,211
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,897
of 273,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#66
of 204 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,101,174 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 204 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.