↓ Skip to main content

Neuroreflexotherapy for non-specific low-back pain

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
131 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neuroreflexotherapy for non-specific low-back pain
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2004
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003009.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gerard Urrútia, A Kim Burton, Antoni Morral Fernández, Xavier Bonfill Cosp, Gustavo Zanoli

Abstract

Among the wide range of therapeutic alternatives proposed for the management of low-back pain (LBP), a less widely used technique from Spain, called neuroreflexotherapy (NRT) has claimed to show very favourable results, mainly in patients with chronic low-back pain.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 130 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 16%
Student > Master 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 12%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 28 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 7%
Psychology 9 7%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 34 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,281,668
of 16,470,846 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,402
of 11,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,239
of 292,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#77
of 233 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,470,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,507 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 233 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.