You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
日本人とアメリカ人の大腸の長さは違うのか?―大腸3D-CT(仮想内視鏡)による1,300名の検討―
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.11280/gee.55.435 |
| Authors |
永田 浩一, 田尻 久雄, 光島 徹, 歌野 健一, 高林 健, 渡辺 直輝, 赤羽 麻奈, 加藤 貴司, 平山 眞章 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 151 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 44 | 29% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 151 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 50% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 1 | 50% |
| Engineering | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2024.
All research outputs
#369,765
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY
#2
of 147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,443
of 205,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ENDOSCOPY
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them