↓ Skip to main content

Onco-testicular sperm extraction (Onco-TESE) from a single testis with metachronous bilateral testicular cancer: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Basic and Clinical Andrology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Onco-testicular sperm extraction (Onco-TESE) from a single testis with metachronous bilateral testicular cancer: a case report
Published in
Basic and Clinical Andrology, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12610-018-0066-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Itsuto Hamano, Shingo Hatakeyama, Rika Nakamura, Rie Fukuhara, Daisuke Noro, Hiroko Seino, Takahiro Yoneyama, Yasuhiro Hashimoto, Takuya Koie, Yoshihito Yokoyama, Chikara Ohyama

Abstract

Although oncologic testicular sperm extraction (onco-TESE) has been increasingly practiced, the evidence of onco-TESE performed in patients with testicular cancer is insufficient. Furthermore, in bilateral testicular cancer, accounting for 0.5%-1% of testicular cancers, onco-TESE is more challenging and has been insufficiently reported. Here we report the case of a 25-year-old man who underwent onco-TESE from his residual single testis with a nonseminomatous germ cell tumor that occurred 5 years after orchiectomy of the contralateral testis. A second orchiectomy and simultaneous TESE from the noncancerous testicular tissue were performed. The pathological diagnosis was germ cell tumors, tumors of more than one histological type (embryonal carcinoma, immature teratoma, yolk sac tumor, seminoma, and choriocarcinoma; pT1N0M0). The patient subsequently married and hoped for fatherhood 3 years later. Whereas histological diagnosis of the normal testicular tissue was Johnsen score 6 (maturation arrest), morphologically normal and motile sperms were successfully retrieved from thawed TESE samples and used for multiple cycles of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Although the conception has not been succeeded to date, ICSI attempts have been continuing. This case demonstrates the effectiveness of onco-TESE for challenging cases such as bilateral and nonseminmatous testicular cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 6 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2018.
All research outputs
#20,663,600
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Basic and Clinical Andrology
#108
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#344,098
of 450,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Basic and Clinical Andrology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them