↓ Skip to main content

Improving the design of a mCSCL Chinese character forming game with a distributed scaffolding design framework

Overview of attention for article published in Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving the design of a mCSCL Chinese character forming game with a distributed scaffolding design framework
Published in
Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, December 2017
DOI 10.1186/s41039-017-0066-4
Authors

Lung-Hsiang Wong, Chee-Kit Looi, Ivica Boticki

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 25%
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 25%
Unspecified 2 25%
Linguistics 1 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Other 1 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,373,056
of 12,781,938 outputs
Outputs from Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning
#43
of 76 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,326
of 346,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,781,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 76 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them