You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of tip and torque on virtual study models: a validation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Progress in Orthodontics, July 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2196-1042-14-19 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luis T Huanca Ghislanzoni, Megan Lineberger, Lucia HS Cevidanes, Andra Mapelli, Chiarella Sforza, James A McNamara |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 51% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Progress in Orthodontics
#54
of 255 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,305
of 209,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Progress in Orthodontics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 255 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,857 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them