↓ Skip to main content

Long-term antibiotics for preventing recurrent urinary tract infection in children

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-term antibiotics for preventing recurrent urinary tract infection in children
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001534.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabrielle Williams, Jonathan C Craig

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 1%
Macao 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 145 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Researcher 17 11%
Other 15 10%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 38 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 39 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,251,110
of 13,715,693 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,044
of 10,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,389
of 279,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#124
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,715,693 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.