↓ Skip to main content

A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Modelling, September 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
8 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2063 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3454 Mendeley
citeulike
22 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models
Published in
Ecological Modelling, September 2006
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.04.023
Authors

Volker Grimm, Uta Berger, Finn Bastiansen, Sigrunn Eliassen, Vincent Ginot, Jarl Giske, John Goss-Custard, Tamara Grand, Simone K. Heinz, Geir Huse, Andreas Huth, Jane U. Jepsen, Christian Jørgensen, Wolf M. Mooij, Birgit Müller, Guy Pe’er, Cyril Piou, Steven F. Railsback, Andrew M. Robbins, Martha M. Robbins, Eva Rossmanith, Nadja Rüger, Espen Strand, Sami Souissi, Richard A. Stillman, Rune Vabø, Ute Visser, Donald L. DeAngelis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,454 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 67 2%
United Kingdom 39 1%
Brazil 21 <1%
Spain 17 <1%
France 17 <1%
Canada 17 <1%
Germany 15 <1%
Colombia 10 <1%
South Africa 9 <1%
Other 91 3%
Unknown 3151 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 924 27%
Researcher 655 19%
Student > Master 526 15%
Student > Bachelor 208 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 195 6%
Other 538 16%
Unknown 408 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 942 27%
Environmental Science 608 18%
Engineering 240 7%
Computer Science 234 7%
Social Sciences 188 5%
Other 657 19%
Unknown 585 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2023.
All research outputs
#2,138,499
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Modelling
#97
of 2,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,370
of 89,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Modelling
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,342 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.