↓ Skip to main content

Home-based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Home-based therapy programmes for upper limb functional recovery following stroke
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006755.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona Coupar, Alex Pollock, Lynn A Legg, Catherine Sackley, Paulette van Vliet

Abstract

With an increased focus on home-based stroke services and the undertaking of programmes, targeted at upper limb recovery within clinical practice, a systematic review of home-based therapy programmes for individuals with upper limb impairment following stroke was required.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 191 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 16%
Researcher 29 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Other 14 7%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 28 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 15%
Neuroscience 14 7%
Engineering 13 7%
Psychology 13 7%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 38 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,141,950
of 14,674,316 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,029
of 11,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,748
of 281,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#165
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,674,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,038 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.