You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of lipid-based nutrient supplement provision to pregnant women on newborn size in rural Malawi: a randomized controlled trial 2 3
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3945/ajcn.114.088617 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Per Ashorn, Lotta Alho, Ulla Ashorn, Yin Bun Cheung, Kathryn G Dewey, Ulla Harjunmaa, Anna Lartey, Minyanga Nkhoma, Nozgechi Phiri, John Phuka, Stephen A Vosti, Mamane Zeilani, Kenneth Maleta |
| Abstract |
Small birth size, often associated with insufficient maternal nutrition, contributes to a large share of global child undernutrition, morbidity, and mortality. We developed a small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplement (SQ-LNS) to enrich the diets of pregnant women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 349 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 343 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 66 | 19% |
| Researcher | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 17% |
| Unknown | 83 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 27 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 47 | 13% |
| Unknown | 99 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2016.
All research outputs
#8,059,753
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#7,590
of 12,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,349
of 374,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#74
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.5. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.