You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Drivers and mechanisms of tree mortality in moist tropical forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Phytologist, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1111/nph.15027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nate McDowell, Craig D. Allen, Kristina Anderson‐Teixeira, Paulo Brando, Roel Brienen, Jeff Chambers, Brad Christoffersen, Stuart Davies, Chris Doughty, Alvaro Duque, Fernando Espirito‐Santo, Rosie Fisher, Clarissa G. Fontes, David Galbraith, Devin Goodsman, Charlotte Grossiord, Henrik Hartmann, Jennifer Holm, Daniel J. Johnson, Abd. Rahman Kassim, Michael Keller, Charlie Koven, Lara Kueppers, Tomo'omi Kumagai, Yadvinder Malhi, Sean M. McMahon, Maurizio Mencuccini, Patrick Meir, Paul Moorcroft, Helene C. Muller‐Landau, Oliver L. Phillips, Thomas Powell, Carlos A. Sierra, John Sperry, Jeff Warren, Chonggang Xu, Xiangtao Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 116 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 18% |
| France | 14 | 12% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Thailand | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 47 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 84 | 72% |
| Scientists | 26 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 735 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 735 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 136 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 127 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 97 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 46 | 6% |
| Other | 123 | 17% |
| Unknown | 152 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 231 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 198 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 60 | 8% |
| Engineering | 10 | 1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 38 | 5% |
| Unknown | 190 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 216. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#181,812
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from New Phytologist
#41
of 10,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,255
of 354,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Phytologist
#2
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,109 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,394 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.