You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
A Bottom-Up Method and Fast Algorithms for max independent set
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 7 |
| Book title |
Algorithm Theory - SWAT 2010
|
| Published in |
ADS, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-642-13731-0_7 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-64-213730-3, 978-3-64-213731-0
|
| Authors |
Nicolas Bourgeois, Bruno Escoffier, Vangelis Th. Paschos, Johan M. M. van Rooij, Bourgeois, Nicolas, Escoffier, Bruno, Paschos, Vangelis Th., Rooij, Johan M. M. van, van Rooij, Johan M. M. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 17% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 2 | 33% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 17% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,546,261
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from ADS
#9,312
of 37,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,853
of 94,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ADS
#99
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37,450 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,723 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.