You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Frequency and Outcomes of Reduced Dose Non–Vitamin K Antagonist Anticoagulants: Results From ORBIT‐AF II (The Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1161/jaha.117.007633 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Benjamin A. Steinberg, Peter Shrader, Karen Pieper, Laine Thomas, Larry A. Allen, Jack Ansell, Paul S. Chan, Michael D. Ezekowitz, Gregg C. Fonarow, James V. Freeman, Bernard J. Gersh, Peter R. Kowey, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Gerald V. Naccarelli, James A. Reiffel, Daniel E. Singer, Eric D. Peterson, Jonathan P. Piccini, the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation II Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 19 | 30% |
| United States | 5 | 8% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Serbia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 79% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 159 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Researcher | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Unknown | 54 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 60 | 38% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 68 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2018.
All research outputs
#385,187
of 25,634,695 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
#481
of 8,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,902
of 351,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
#9
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,634,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.